MR Woodcock's letter in Messenger (October 30) raises a very valid point.
If a private company costs £2.25m less than the council service and yet will be making a tidy profit, no doubt, why does the council run service (which has no need to make a profit) cost so much more?
Perhaps the council could start economies by all working as volunteers, as they are asking others to do.
Why does leader of the council Sean Anstee need £40,000 a year?
Councillors should work for the benefit of the community, not as a profession.
They do not need to be paid large sums of money to attend meetings; these can be arranged to fit in with their normal day-time employment.
If they do not like this, then why become a councillor?
A recent programme showed that a northern council had cut waste collection to once every three weeks and bins were overflowing.
It seems that councils have no concern for public health.
We are turning back the clock to pre-Victorian times when rubbish was left to rot in the streets and typhoid, cholera and TB were hazards of everyday living.
I would rather see an increase in Council Tax, if this ensured a decent regular system of waste collection, regular cleaning of drains, and roads and pavements which did not represent a hazard to life and limb.
David Olliver, address supplied
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here