I WOULD like to reply to the letter in Messenger, regarding someone not agreeing with the fact a Sale marketing firm is backing an animal charity [the Society for Abandoned Animals] instead of a people charity.

I would just like to point out to this person, who is obviously not an animal lover, that most of these animal charities, look after abused, neglected or sick animals.

These animals are in these places through no fault of their own, but because of the ignorance and neglect caused by people who should not own animals at all.

So why should these innocent animals suffer bacause of certain people?

Name and address supplied