Trafford MP criticises Network Rail over Urmston Railway Station fence

Kate Green and Walmsley Grove residents at the fence

Kate Green and Walmsley Grove residents at the fence

First published in News Messenger Newspapers: Photograph of the Author by , Reporter

THE MP for Stretford and Urmston has called on Network Rail to address residents’ concerns after it removed a wall at Urmston Railway Station without consulting them.


Kate Green wrote to Network Rail in February but was disappointment with the rail operator’s response and criticised its lack of consultation with occupants of Walmsley Grove, who live directly behind the station.


Julie Bowling, who lives on Walmsley Grove, first wrote to Network Rail around two years ago to express concern that the wall dividing the street from the train station was crumbling, but Network Rail assured her the wall was safe.


However, some months later, the boundary wall was demolished and Network Rail replaced it with concrete blocks and fencing, without first informing residents.
When Ms Green asked if the fence could be replaced she was told ‘cost effective solutions’ had to take priority.


Ms Green said: “I’m disappointed that Network Rail didn’t consult local people about such a significant change to their surroundings.


“Walmsley Grove residents should have had their views considered and I’ve written again to the chief executive at Network Rail to ask for a proper explanation of why a consultation didn’t take place.”


A spokesman for Network Rail said: “The previous wall was damaged beyond repair and replaced with the fence which meets our commitments to be cost-efficient and to clearly mark the railway boundary.


“Under permitted development rights, we did not need to consult on the replacement fence which is designed to keep the railway as safe and secure as possible.


“There are ongoing safety campaigns to raise awareness of the dangers of trespassing on the railway and we encourage anyone to report any acts of trespass or vandalism they witness.”
 

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

11:52am Fri 13 Jun 14

o_b__1 says...

Its shame they didn't put a gate in as well, access to the station is pretty poor as it stands and this would have been an opportunity to improve it slightly.

"we did not need to consult", this kind of misses the point, which does indicate NR doesn't really care what local residents think. It would've been very easy to ask or at least, inform, especially after someone had written to them to warn them about the state of the wall. They appear to have just demonstrated, just don't care what you think, regardless of what they have to do.
Its shame they didn't put a gate in as well, access to the station is pretty poor as it stands and this would have been an opportunity to improve it slightly. "we did not need to consult", this kind of misses the point, which does indicate NR doesn't really care what local residents think. It would've been very easy to ask or at least, inform, especially after someone had written to them to warn them about the state of the wall. They appear to have just demonstrated, just don't care what you think, regardless of what they have to do. o_b__1
  • Score: 4

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree