MP demands answers on why waste water from fracking was dumped into the Manchester Ship Canal

Messenger Newspapers: United Utilities treatment works in Davyhulme United Utilities treatment works in Davyhulme

THE MP for Stretford and Urmston has demanded to know why waste water from fracking was dumped into the Manchester Ship Canal.


Kate Green spoke out after a BBC Inside Out programme aired on Monday, January 27, reported that before October 2011, radioactive water from Cuadrilla’s fracking operations was handled at United Utilities (UU) treatment works in Davyhulme and, after treatment, released into the Manchester Ship Canal.


A UU spokesman said water from Cuadrilla’s Preece Hall site was treated at Davyhulme, but under a licence granted by the Environment Agency (EA) and this treatment stopped in September 2011, when the EA amended the licence.


The spokesman said the effluent released into the ship canal complied with the EA-granted licence.


Ms Green has now written to the chief executiveof UU to ask how much radioactive waste water from fracking was treated at Davyhulme before the regulations changed, and how much waste was released into the Manchester Ship Canal or elsewhere.


“I am extremely concerned that radioactive waste water has been released into our local waterways,” said Ms Green.


“Local residents are rightly worried, which is why I have written to the chief executive of United Utilities to ask for a full explanation of their involvement with waste water from fracking.


“Full and open disclosure from Cuadrilla and United Utilities is essential so that we can get to the bottom of why this has happened.”


A UU spokesman said: “United Utilities takes its environmental responsibilities in controlling discharges to watercourses very seriously and complied fully with permits issued by the regulator.”
 

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

1:06pm Sun 2 Feb 14

SadButMadLad says...

Are MPs thick or what? The answers have been given. The waste was processed properly according to the legal requirements of the time. Is Kate Green asking for retrospective legislation so that when ever a law changes, that anyone who did something legal before the change is charged by the new law. That's not how our society works. Building regulations have changed, so all the old buildings are illegal now in Kate Green's view.
Are MPs thick or what? The answers have been given. The waste was processed properly according to the legal requirements of the time. Is Kate Green asking for retrospective legislation so that when ever a law changes, that anyone who did something legal before the change is charged by the new law. That's not how our society works. Building regulations have changed, so all the old buildings are illegal now in Kate Green's view. SadButMadLad
  • Score: -27

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree